• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Carlone Technology Group

IT Project Delivery Execution

  • Areas of Focus
  • Methodology
  • Who Is CTG?
  • Insights & Publications
  • Areas of Focus
  • Methodology
  • Who Is CTG?
  • Insights & Publications

Ralph Carlone

CTG Pro Tip: If Any Governance Artifact Takes More Than 45 Minutes to Complete, It’s Too Big

Introduction: The Pitfall of Overcomplicated Governance

In the project management discipline, governance artifacts such as project charters, risk registers, and status reports are essential tools that guide decision-making and ensure accountability. However, when these documents become overly complex, they can hinder progress rather than facilitate it.

At Carlone Technology Group (CTG), we advocate for a lean approach to governance documentation. Our guiding principle is straightforward: if creating or updating a governance artifact takes more than 45 minutes, it’s too big.

The 45-Minute Rule: Embracing Lean Governance

The 45-minute rule serves as a benchmark to keep governance artifacts concise and effective. This approach aligns with lean documentation principles, which emphasize delivering just enough information to support decision-making without unnecessary complexity.

Why 45 Minutes?

  • Efficiency: Time-consuming documents can delay critical decisions.
  • Clarity: Concise artifacts are easier to understand and use.
  • Focus: Limiting time spent encourages prioritization of essential information and forces collaboration with key decision-makers and stakeholders.

Implementing Lean Governance at CTG

At CTG, we integrate the 45-minute rule into our project delivery framework to enhance efficiency and maintain focus on value-driven outcomes.

Step-by-Step Guide:

  1. Identify Core Purpose: Determine the essential objective of the artifact.
  2. Use Templates: Employ standardized templates to streamline creation.
  3. Set Time Limits: Allocate a maximum of 45 minutes for drafting or updating.
  4. Review for Clarity: Ensure the document communicates its message succinctly.
  5. Solicit Feedback: Gather input from stakeholders to confirm usefulness.

Benefits of the 45-Minute Rule

  • Improved Productivity: Less time spent on documentation means more time for execution.
  • Enhanced Communication: Clear, concise documents facilitate better understanding among team members.
  • Agility: Quickly produced artifacts allow for faster response to project changes.

Conclusion: Embrace Lean for Effective Governance

By adhering to the 45-minute rule, organizations can streamline their governance processes, reduce waste, and focus on delivering value. At CTG, this approach is integral to our commitment to efficient and effective project delivery.

Connect with us!

This tip was originally presented in our post, Bridging the Gap: Why 2025 Is the Year of Hybrid Project Management 📚

Bridging the Gap: Why 2025 Is the Year of Hybrid Project Management

How to blend Agile speed with Waterfall certainty – and why Carlone Technology Group’s V-Map Framework helps teams do both.


1 | Why this topic is trending  

The 2025 PMI Pulse of the Profession® report underscores a pivotal shift: project professionals must move from tactical execution to strategic value creation. Central to this evolution is business acumen, a trait that empowers professionals to tailor methods to fit project context, stakeholder goals, and organizational strategy.

In today’s climate, portfolios often span infrastructure upgrades, AI pilots, in-house builds, ERP integrations, and regulatory mandates. There is no one-size-fits-all methodology. Executives want the governance of Waterfall, while product teams thrive in Agile. Enter the need for a hybrid model that adapts delivery without compromising control.


2 | The backstory: how we got here

  1. Early 2000s: Waterfall reigned; PMOs enforced gate reviews and exhaustive charters.
  2. 2010‑2020: Digital disruption brought Agile (e.g., stand‑ups, Kanban boards, user stories), and often in stealth mode outside the PMO.

Now in 2025, executives are demanding integration: one governance framework that supports tailored delivery approaches based on the work at hand. Smart hybridization is no longer optional.


3 | The V-Map Framework

At Carlone Technology Group, we’ve seen countless delivery breakdowns caused by mismatched methods. That’s why we developed V-Map, a delivery planning tool based on four vectors of alignment, also known as the “4 V’s”:

VectorCore QuestionCTG “Rule of Thumb”
VisionHow defined is the end-state?Clear = Waterfall; Fuzzy = Agile.
VolatilityHow much change is expected?>15% churn? Use iterative cycles.
Value HorizonWhen must benefits land?<6 months ROI = fast releases.
Vendor-RegulationAre there external contracts or audits?Yes = keep stage-gates.

V-Map™ helps project leads tune delivery models to real-world complexity. You don’t start with a method; you start with the mission.


4 | Pilot the V-Map approach in 30 days

  1. List your active projects and rate them across the 4 V’s (1–5 scale).
  2. Choose two pilots: one volatile tech project and one compliance-heavy upgrade.
  3. Create delivery blends:
    • Agile practices (sprints, demos) for the volatile project
    • Structured checkpoints (stage-gates) plus retrospectives for the regulated one
  4. Set a single portfolio cadence: e.g., Mon stand-up, Wed PMO review, Fri leadership sync.
  5. Retro and refine: capture what worked and where agility clashed with control.

CTG Pro Tip: If any governance artifact takes longer than 45 minutes to complete, it’s too big.

If any single artifact (like a RAID log or a project health report) takes more than 45 minutes to complete, it’s probably:

  • Too detailed
  • Poorly structured
  • Not aligned with its intended value

This tip is a guideline to ensure lean, effective, and efficient governance — something Carlone Technology Group (CTG) champions in Project Delivery and Execution.

Learn more about this pro tip!


5 | How to put this into action Monday morning

  • Rename your PMO to the Project Delivery Office (PDO) to signal modern practices
  • Distribute a one-page V-Map matrix to help teams assess and choose delivery methods
  • Assign mentors instead of mandates: position seasoned PMs as delivery coaches
  • Show wins across styles: celebrate a successful sprint demo and a well-run stage-gate review in the same portfolio meeting

6 | Conclusion: Hybrid as a strategic advantage

Hybrid isn’t chaos, it’s calibrated delivery. The V-Map Framework gives organizations a structured yet flexible way to align the delivery method to the business context. And when delivery fits the mission, outcomes improve.

Ready to try it? CTG offers a 30-day “Hybrid Calibration Sprint” to test V-Map with two of your current projects.

Moving from Outputs to Outcomes: A PMP-Inspired Take

I recently read an insightful article called by Marty Cagan and Felipe Castro on shifting from “outputs” (the features we build) to “outcomes” (the value we create). It’s a concept that resonates deeply with Project Management Professional (PMP) principles, especially those taught by PMI.org.

Here is a correlation of the article’s main points alongside core PMP practices:

1. Defining Clear Problems and Goals

– Article Insight: Vague goals lead to “feature factories” that deliver outputs without verifying real impact.

– PMP Perspective: The project Charter should specify tangible objectives and success metrics. Defining the problem clearly helps ensure each deliverable ties back to a genuine need.

– My experience: In many cases, underperforming or languishing projects can be revitalized by returning to the core purpose and the outcomes the business truly needs. By taking an honest look at where the project stands now and aligning on the results we want at completion, organizations can decide whether to refocus and continue, reset the approach, or end the effort altogether.

2. Establishing Meaningful Measures of Success

– Article Insight: Not all KPIs matter. Find the few that truly reflect desired user or business behaviors.

– PMP Perspective: Monitoring & Controlling goes beyond schedule and budget; it verifies that metrics align with the project’s intended value, enabling data-driven adjustments.

– Field experience: Rather than getting caught up in buzzwords or workshops to redefine KPI’s or OKR’s, we can simplify the conversation by consistently evaluating whether our project’s progress aligns with its original objectives. This helps us stay honest about whether our completed work, and the tasks ahead, still serve the outcomes we intended. If new insights arise, we can adapt accordingly! From a PMP perspective, this continual check is essentially Quality Management in real-time, ensuring every effort contributes to the project’s true value proposition.

3. Building an Intentional Strategy

– Article Insight: Simply listing features doesn’t guarantee outcomes; a product strategy must guide the “why” behind each choice.

– PMP Perspective: Integration Management weaves scope, risk, and stakeholder requirements into a coherent roadmap. Strategy ensures each task or deliverable supports broader organizational objectives.

– Field experience: When leadership lacks a clear and unified business strategy, teams inevitably default to delivering work shaped by individual biases—whether intentional or not. A vague or inconsistent strategy can set the entire organization (investors, employees, and clients) on a path to long-term friction, at best. Tools like a Requirements Traceability Matrix can help ensure every effort maps back to that unified strategy. By regularly reviewing and directing intentional effort, leadership can effectively Manage Change and keep the organization aligned on its true strategic objectives.

4. Instrumenting for Real-Time Feedback

– Article Insight: Ongoing telemetry helps teams pivot quickly if outcomes fall short.

– PMP Perspective: Frequent stakeholder communication and adaptive methods (Agile) let PMs respond to new data and maintain alignment with goals. Real-time analytics is the backbone of fact-based, informed decision-making.

– Field experience: In reality, reporting and managing status updates can feel like two separate worlds. Project managers often expend significant effort drafting comprehensive weekly updates—only to watch them glossed over by leaders celebrating superficial wins. This disconnect stems from a broader lack of accountability at the leadership level. We owe it to our stakeholders (and our teams) to provide an honest, data-driven view of the work, and to address problems immediately when outcomes and progress deviate from plan.

5. Fostering Accountability and Leadership Support

– Article Insight: Cultural change, driven by leaders, is key to shifting from output-based thinking to outcome-driven cultures.

– PMP Perspective: Governance and Change Management become essential: leaders must champion a results-oriented mindset to embed accountability at every level.

– Field experience: Accountability starts at the top! When leaders consistently model results-oriented behavior and emphasize outcomes over outputs, teams naturally align more effectively. Conversely, if leadership is not unified on organizational outcomes, even the strongest product or project management methodologies will struggle, resulting in confusion and wasted efforts. A transparent and supportive leadership culture is crucial for keeping everyone focused on meaningful impact and ensuring that each milestone genuinely advances the organization toward its objectives.

Key Takeaway: The article’s message dovetails nicely with PMP principles! Whether you’re delivering a software product or leading a strategic project, the goal remains the same: solve the real problems, track your metrics diligently, and continuously align with the overarching strategy and organizational vision. By marrying the article’s focus on outcomes with PMI’s structure for planning, executing, and measuring success, teams can be confident they’re delivering genuine value—not just another “cool feature.”

Project Rescue & Delivery Oversight: How CTG Brings Projects Back from the Brink

In every organization’s portfolio, there are projects that quietly slip off-track. They start with enthusiasm and solid intentions, but somewhere along the line, they stall, sprawl, or spiral. Sometimes it’s scope creep. Sometimes it’s resource misalignment. Often, it’s just the accumulation of small misses that snowball into a critical breakdown.

At Carlone Technology Group (CTG), project rescue is not just something we do—it’s one of the ways we deliver our most transformative impact. With 30+ years of experience in infrastructure, application, and cybersecurity project delivery, we step into complex, high-stakes environments and provide the leadership, clarity, and execution discipline that turn failing initiatives into success stories.

The Anatomy of a Failing Project

One of the most common calls we get starts like this: “We need help. This project is off the rails.”

Take, for example, a Fortune 1000 financial services company that reached out to us mid-implementation of a massive CRM migration. They were six months past their original go-live date, vendor invoices were stacking up, and user confidence had hit rock bottom.

Our project rescue approach always begins with a Project Health Assessment, including:

  • Stakeholder interviews across tech and business teams
  • Review of scope, change requests, and delivery artifacts
  • Timeline validation against actual velocity
  • Risk log audit

In this case, we identified five core issues:

  • Unclear ownership between the client and third-party vendor
  • No single source of truth for project status
  • Conflicting priorities between departments
  • Scope creep with no formal change control process
  • Low morale among team members due to uncertainty

With these insights, we built a remediation plan and took over as delivery oversight.

Establishing Delivery Discipline: The First 30 Days

In the first 30 days, we focus on stabilizing the project and re-establishing structure:

  1. Clarify governance: Who owns what? Who approves what?
  2. Create visibility: Launch real-time status dashboards and weekly executive reports
  3. Align stakeholders: Reconfirm business objectives and trade-offs
  4. Clean up scope: Freeze scope and introduce formal change control
  5. Rebuild momentum: Quick wins that restore confidence

For the CRM rescue, we ran parallel tracks: one to finish mission-critical integrations, and another to redesign the training and adoption plan. Within 60 days, the project was back on a revised but firm timeline. 90 days in, user adoption was up 58%, and customer service metrics had improved noticeably.

Real-World Rescue Stories

1. Healthcare ERP Deployment

A regional healthcare system engaged us to rescue an ERP deployment spanning finance, HR, and clinical operations. The software was sound, but the delivery process was fragmented and unstructured. Departments were blaming each other. Reporting was inconsistent. Workstreams were duplicating effort.

CTG stepped in as the central program delivery office. We implemented a workstream governance model, introduced integrated reporting tools, and facilitated cross-functional standups.

Results:

  • Consolidated 40+ disconnected spreadsheets into a unified project tracker
  • Delivered go-live early
  • Reduced user-reported issues by 60% in the first post-launch month

2. Cybersecurity Audit Preparation

A SaaS company was six weeks away from a third-party cybersecurity audit tied to major enterprise sales contracts. Their internal team was strong technically but disorganized in execution. Policies were incomplete, evidence was scattered, and leadership had no visibility.

We ran a hyper-focused rescue mission, introducing agile sprints for policy review, establishing a document repository, and running readiness simulations.

Results:

  • Passed the audit with zero major findings
  • Sales team closed $4M in new contracts within the quarter
  • Executive team adopted our delivery model company-wide for future security initiatives

3. Remote Workforce Tool Rationalization

A technology services firm operating across six time zones had fallen into “tool sprawl.” They were using 15+ communication and project management tools, leading to delays, confusion, and missed handoffs. Morale and productivity were both suffering.

We conducted a rapid diagnostic, consolidated tooling into three platforms, created usage standards, and coached team leads on digital etiquette.

Results:

  • Reduced tool cost by 30%
  • Increased cross-team delivery velocity by 45%
  • Boosted internal satisfaction (measured by employee pulse survey) by 22%

What Makes CTG’s Delivery Oversight Different

Project rescue requires more than project management certifications. It takes:

  • Empathy and diplomacy to manage stressed stakeholders
  • Structured thinking to bring order to chaos
  • Cross-functional literacy to align tech, business, and compliance
  • Executive presence to communicate with clarity and confidence

At CTG, we don’t just manage timelines and tasks. We:

  • Rebuild trust where it’s been lost
  • Translate complexity into clear action plans
  • Drive toward meaningful outcomes, not just checkboxes

The Long-Term Benefits of Rescue and Oversight

While our immediate goal is to save the project, the long-term value is even greater:

  • Stronger governance frameworks
  • Improved risk management culture
  • Higher stakeholder satisfaction
  • Better ROI on tech investments

Often, clients retain us after a rescue to oversee future programs and embed our methodology into their teams. In doing so, they prevent future breakdowns and create a culture of proactive, disciplined delivery.

When to Call in CTG

If you’re seeing any of the following, it might be time to bring us in:

  • Repeated delays without clear causes
  • Burnout or attrition among key project staff
  • Conflicting reports on status or progress
  • Budget overruns and change order confusion
  • Stakeholders disengaging or losing trust

We know what red flags look like—and more importantly, we know how to respond.

From Rescue to Resilience

In a world of constant change, it’s no longer enough to start strong. Organizations must finish strong. Whether it’s an application rollout, cybersecurity initiative, infrastructure refresh, or business process modernization, disciplined delivery is the difference between good ideas and real impact.

At Carlone Technology Group, our project rescue and delivery oversight work is a cornerstone of that impact. We don’t just bring projects back from the brink. We turn them into platforms for lasting transformation.


If you’re staring at a project dashboard that’s more red than green, don’t wait. Let’s talk. We can help you steady the ship, build confidence, and deliver results—without the drama.

Why Delivery Discipline is the Most Underrated Advantage in Tech Consulting

In the world of IT consulting, success is often measured by technical innovation, architecture elegance, or the ability to deploy cutting-edge solutions. But there’s a hidden truth many organizations learn the hard way: none of it matters without disciplined delivery.

At Carlone Technology Group (CTG), we’ve built our reputation on designing effective solutions and ensuring those solutions are implemented on time, within budget, and fully adopted. With over 30 years of experience in infrastructure, applications, and cybersecurity, we’ve learned that delivery discipline isn’t just a back-office function—it’s the competitive advantage that defines success.

The Cost of Overlooking Delivery

Let’s start with what happens when delivery is overlooked. One of our clients, a mid-sized financial services firm, had invested heavily in a cloud migration initiative. They brought in top-tier architects, partnered with major cloud vendors, and had executive support. Yet, two years in, the project was over budget by 70%, key components were still in testing, and end-users had lost trust.

CTG was brought in to assess and rescue the initiative. What we found wasn’t a tech issue—it was a delivery failure:

  • No clear RACI (responsible/accountable/consulted/informed) model
  • Agile ceremonies inconsistently applied
  • Teams unclear on prioritization
  • Missed dependencies between security and app teams

Within 90 days of engagement, we implemented a delivery framework that included daily standups, backlog realignment, and a fact-based status dashboard. Six months later, the migration was completed. Adoption went up 50%, and leadership reallocated budget to other strategic priorities.

Delivery as a Strategic Lever

Delivery is not just about Gantt charts and standups. Done right, it becomes a lever for:

  • Accelerating time-to-value
  • Improving organizational trust in IT
  • Increasing resource efficiency
  • Strengthening cross-functional collaboration

A great example is a manufacturing client we supported in deploying an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system across six divisions. While the ERP software was off-the-shelf, the challenge was aligning business units, each with its own processes and resistance to change.

Rather than treat this as a technical implementation, we led with delivery discipline:

  • Engaged stakeholders through working groups
  • Created cross-functional pilot teams
  • Set up a feedback loop between end users and the dev/configuration team
  • Tracked burn-down charts by workstream to ensure visibility

As a result, go-live occurred ahead of schedule, and user training satisfaction scored 93% on post-deployment surveys. IT was no longer the department of “no”—they were seen as a transformation partner.

Why So Many Get It Wrong

In our experience, delivery fails when it’s:

  • Understaffed: Project management is seen as overhead
  • Unstructured: No standardized methodology or frameworks
  • Undervalued: Success is measured only by output, not outcomes

This is especially true in cybersecurity projects. One recent engagement involved helping a retail client implement new endpoint protection and MFA protocols across 10,000+ employees. Their internal IT teams were skilled, but overwhelmed. There was no rollout plan, and compliance deadlines were looming.

We stepped in with a hybrid approach:

  • Defined phased deployment by business unit
  • Created training materials and change communications
  • Synced legal, IT, and HR on policy updates
  • Used delivery metrics to report progress to the board weekly

The client not only met their compliance deadline, but experienced a 70% drop in phishing-related incidents within the first quarter.

Delivery Discipline in Remote and Hybrid Environments

The rise of hybrid work has made disciplined delivery even more crucial. In one project for a healthtech startup, we were brought in to help streamline their digital collaboration tools. Teams were remote across five time zones, using a mishmash of Slack, email, Google Drive, and Notion. Projects were slipping, and morale was low.

We conducted a tool audit and designed a cohesive digital workplace:

  • Implemented Asana for project visibility
  • Created documentation hubs in Notion
  • Facilitated remote team rituals (Monday check-ins, Friday demos)
  • Rolled out a governance model for tool usage

Productivity rebounded, and leadership finally had clarity into what was being worked on. Perhaps more importantly, team satisfaction rose because people weren’t working in chaos.

The CTG Methodology: Vision to Execution

Our approach is grounded in a simple truth: every project lives or dies by how well it’s delivered.

We use a repeatable but flexible methodology:

  1. Problem Identification: What are we solving?
  2. Analysis & Synthesis: What is the root cause and what options exist?
  3. Presentation: What’s the plan, and how will it align stakeholders?
  4. Design & Implementation: Build with discipline
  5. Transition: Ensure adoption, knowledge transfer, and measurement

This methodology has helped clients recover failing initiatives, launch new platforms, and increase the ROI on their tech investments.

What Delivery Discipline Looks Like in Action

A Fortune 500 client once told us, “You made our project feel simple.” That’s the magic of delivery discipline. When roles are clear, communication is frequent, and blockers are resolved quickly, even the most complex projects feel smooth.

For example:

  • A healthcare client’s patient portal modernization launched 4 weeks early
  • A cloud migration we led finished under budget due to early risk detection
  • A cybersecurity framework implementation passed external audit with zero findings

None of these outcomes happened by accident. They were the result of structured delivery leadership combined with technical excellence.

Conclusion: Delivery is a Brand Advantage

In today’s market, clients don’t just want solutions—they want certainty. They want to know their initiatives will land. That’s what Carlone Technology Group brings.

We believe delivery is the most underrated advantage in IT consulting. It transforms vision into execution. It makes your investment count.

If you’re struggling to bring order to the chaos, or if you simply want a partner who gets it done without the drama, let’s talk.


Want to see how delivery discipline can change the game for your organization? Reach out today. We’ll help you make it real.

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

Let’s get started on your project!

Contact us to kick things off. This will be more fun than you think!
I Am Ready!
  • Areas of Focus
  • Methodology
  • Who Is CTG?
  • Insights & Publications

Copyright © 2025 · Carlone Technology Group